獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 14   誰瀏覽過: 42 users

投票

What do you guys think of a political lobby

Yes
15
NO
10
Good Idea Needs Work
4

投票總數: 24
18.05.2014 - 14:14
So i had a great idea a little while ago and it was to have a seperate Lobby for RP and UNs and other maps people find less then satisfactory for traditional atwar, what do you guys think comment and leave suggestions.
----


We are not the same- I am a Martian.
載入中...
載入中...
18.05.2014 - 14:16
Make also 1 vote with : NOBODY CARESSSSSSSSSSSSS D:
----





作者: Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
載入中...
載入中...
18.05.2014 - 14:18
So far 4 people care
----


We are not the same- I am a Martian.
載入中...
載入中...
18.05.2014 - 14:20
No, it's a normal game like everything else.
----
It's not the end.

載入中...
載入中...
18.05.2014 - 18:03
Yes
----
載入中...
載入中...
19.05.2014 - 01:09
This is bad idea hell. It will enter the door for so many different lobbies that are pointless. A lobby for WW1 and WW2 games only, lobby for 3v3 EU+ only, lobby for World 50k only, Colonial Scenarios only, other scenarios only, the list goes on and on. AtWar doesn't yet have the community size to worry about over crowding the main lobby. If these RP and UN games are too much for you to see in the lobby than I suggest a game change. Them being there doesn't at all affect you playing a 3v3 game on EU+.
載入中...
載入中...
19.05.2014 - 11:43
How about we just tag certain games as "Diplomacy" games and add it as a filter. Therefore people who want to play diplomacy games can see all the diplomacy games. Anyone who doesn't play diplomacy games can filter them out.
----
"Riddle me this, Riddle me that...?" - The Riddler

載入中...
載入中...
19.05.2014 - 11:54
I don't think it's necessary considering the community size. But what about a new filter option to see Custom/default games only?
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
載入中...
載入中...
19.05.2014 - 12:29
No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general
----
載入中...
載入中...
19.05.2014 - 23:42
作者: the equalizer, 19.05.2014 at 12:29

No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general


I agree but if we do then we will have an uprising they have numbers on us, and its pointless. We are removing a map bc we don't like it? that is so biased and something this community should not become at all EVER!
載入中...
載入中...
20.05.2014 - 06:06
baby_bullet86
帳戶已刪除
作者: Quantum027, 19.05.2014 at 23:42

作者: the equalizer, 19.05.2014 at 12:29

No, we should just stop making these stupid "RP" and "UN" games in general


I agree but if we do then we will have an uprising they have numbers on us, and its pointless. We are removing a map bc we don't like it? that is so biased and something this community should not become at all EVER!

Become to? LOL. Atwar is already biased mate.
載入中...
載入中...
20.05.2014 - 08:40
I support an 'casuals lobby'
----

載入中...
載入中...
20.05.2014 - 10:46
No need to split up lobbies even more. Also it will have the negative effect of deepening the divide between diplo and regular players, to the extent that I can see both sides never going to try other scenarios since they are going to stick to a lobby. My hope is to convert them, not segregate
載入中...
載入中...
21.05.2014 - 20:47
作者: Aetius, 20.05.2014 at 10:46

No need to split up lobbies even more. Also it will have the negative effect of deepening the divide between diplo and regular players, to the extent that I can see both sides never going to try other scenarios since they are going to stick to a lobby. My hope is to convert them, not segregate

Segregation today segregation tomorrow segregation for ever!!!!!
----
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!