Diplomacy
發表: 73
誰瀏覽過: 680 users
原發表
發表從 Tommchen, 03.01.2011 - 09:35
So I suggest the following:
1. Everybody starts neutral (= what is called peace now)
=> So you have to declare war before you can attack.
2. Being Ally with someone really means something.
=> If you are being attacked, your allies automatically will be in war with your attacker
=> If you declare war on someone, your allies will be asked:
[ ] Keep Alliance (and declare war on...)
[ ] End Alliance (an become neutral with...)
3. And of course you can still offer peace when your ass is being kicked
|
Basically Hearts of Iron 3 diplomacy 
---- "I'd rather betray the world, than let the world betray me."
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
I like the idea but don't agree that you should have to end your alliance with someone if they attack another player and you don't want to. Typically alliances are defensive pacts, and not offensive commitments
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
I love it, I would really love to see this implimented.
---- I hate to advocate drugs alcohol and violence to the kids, but it's always worked for me.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
and all the other games of paradox interactive...
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
Total War diplomacy, Paradox games (such as Europa Universalis). Well, I never knew someone posted about this, lol. I've seen people complain about diplomacy, but someone speaks up alas.  Support.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Blackshark 帳戶已刪除 |
|
sandtime 帳戶已刪除 |
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
This in my opinion would make ally noobs less.... nooby, but if im correct you couldnt ally end long games no? Please correct me of im wrong.
---- -Man on a Mission AkA berserk
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Epic LAG Time 帳戶已刪除 |
