Making SP.

I thought ranking up hard, but the medal system prior to the official release balanced it.

Now, all gold medals are worth 2.5k (instead of a mix of 5k and 10k) and the nearly unobtainable crimsons are only worth 5.

Just putting it out there.

Lol 500 sp for a 6 hour game. and thats only if you win:wall:

I propose max rank be 20, then after you reach 20 you can start again but the rank symbol looks special or something, Idk

作者： acid killers, 13.04.2011 at 20:06

Lol 500 sp for a 6 hour game. and thats only if you win:wall:

Then you must be doing something wrong. I can easily earn 1000 to 2000 sp in a 2 hours game.

作者： Pinheiro, 13.04.2011 at 21:14

作者： acid killers, 13.04.2011 at 20:06

Lol 500 sp for a 6 hour game. and thats only if you win:wall:

Then you must be doing something wrong. I can easily earn 1000 to 2000 sp in a 2 hours game.

it probably was because of an alliance ending

作者： acid killers, 14.04.2011 at 02:19

作者： Pinheiro, 13.04.2011 at 21:14

作者： acid killers, 13.04.2011 at 20:06

Lol 500 sp for a 6 hour game. and thats only if you win:wall:

Then you must be doing something wrong. I can easily earn 1000 to 2000 sp in a 2 hours game.

it probably was because of an alliance ending

lemme guess, you are the one that enters USA alone, conquers both North and south America ad then allies with the Eurasian player that ha killed 100 different enemies and ends the game.

right?

作者： multicultiSTRONG, 14.04.2011 at 07:10

作者： acid killers, 14.04.2011 at 02:19

作者： Pinheiro, 13.04.2011 at 21:14

作者： acid killers, 13.04.2011 at 20:06

Lol 500 sp for a 6 hour game. and thats only if you win:wall:

Then you must be doing something wrong. I can easily earn 1000 to 2000 sp in a 2 hours game.

it probably was because of an alliance ending

lemme guess, you are the one that enters USA alone, conquers both North and south America ad then allies with the Eurasian player that ha killed 100 different enemies and ends the game.

right?

nope

i start in asia, kill a few guys, get bored and ally with the guys who got europe and america.

Interesting strategy.

One that has led to the decline of the West and the rise of the Middle East!

It's unfair to those just arriving since the olde rplayers got to keep the SP they earned from when medals had higher values.

作者： BASED Ironail, 15.04.2011 at 04:24

It's unfair to those just arriving since the olde rplayers got to keep the SP they earned from when medals had higher values.

And now imagine how happy old players would've been if we tried to reset all SP before 1.0...

作者： Ivan, 15.04.2011 at 06:26

作者： BASED Ironail, 15.04.2011 at 04:24

It's unfair to those just arriving since the olde rplayers got to keep the SP they earned from when medals had higher values.

And now imagine how happy old players would've been if we tried to reset all SP before 1.0...

We would have started a Jihad propably.

作者： Ivan, 15.04.2011 at 06:26

作者： BASED Ironail, 15.04.2011 at 04:24

It's unfair to those just arriving since the olde rplayers got to keep the SP they earned from when medals had higher values.

And now imagine how happy old players would've been if we tried to reset all SP before 1.0...

That's the problem of being admin. You will never make a decision without pissing someone.

But I don't think it will be a big problem in the near future, since new players keep arriving everyday, and beta testers will be just a small group inside the big community.

作者： Ivan, 15.04.2011 at 06:26

And now imagine how happy old players would've been if we tried to reset all SP before 1.0...

That would've caused some riots.

Even if you got all the medals there currently are, it would be equivalent, SP-wise, to gathering all the medals from the Beta medal system. The only difference would be that you'd need to occupy 6 or more times the amount of cities now, as you'd have needed to two months ago, due to the nearly unobtainable crimsons.

I don't see why the medal system had to be changed, to be honest.

Nobody else is peeved at the change?

just out of curiosity, why was it changed in the first place?

作者： Garde, 13.04.2011 at 20:14

I propose max rank be 20, then after you reach 20 you can start again but the rank symbol looks special or something, Idk

or we could just go to rank 100 and you get there and yo uget a medal for ranking up. idk to

作者： Vespre, 23.04.2011 at 20:30

Nobody else is peeved at the change?

just out of curiosity, why was it changed in the first place?

If you mean less SP gains - we felt they were too high. SP should come mainly from games - getting some bonus from medals is nice, but it probably should not equal the amount of SP you earn in 20 games.

Also, we have plans to create a lot of new medals - that should balance out the lesser SP gains.

作者： Ivan, 24.04.2011 at 03:44

作者： Vespre, 23.04.2011 at 20:30

Nobody else is peeved at the change?

just out of curiosity, why was it changed in the first place?

If you mean less SP gains - we felt they were too high. SP should come mainly from games - getting some bonus from medals is nice, but it probably should not equal the amount of SP you earn in 20 games.

Also, we have plans to create a lot of new medals - that should balance out the lesser SP gains.

Yay! More medals(maybe my idea about a general killing medal will finally come to fruition)!

Cause so many cilvilian deaths (pop casualty)
remove x amount of income from can't (pop/income casualty)
kill x number of generals
kill x number of air units with anti aircraft
kill x number of units with rare units
spend x number of weeks in game
win x number of battles in defence/attack

They should change the medal system, the easiest way to get SP was through medals, and now they are nearly uneffective.

I'm actually finding SP easier to get ahold of. It's a steady climb but still OK. I just don't know how to spend it and end up piling it up.

U should lower amounts of SP given by medals then u can get medals infinate times