Groups

Coalitions are something useful because you can have a private chat and a private forum. There are some coalitions that are dedicated to cartography and some dedicated to languages.
The problem is that you can not be in more of two coalitions.
Groups would be the solution of this.
Groups would cost less than a coalition. And you would be able to be in all the groups you want.
With this people of Turkey would be able to talk in Turkish in a private chat without annoying nonTurkish players. And I would like to create an Spanish group also.
With groups people would be able to work in maps and have a chance of being in a competitive coalition.
With groups players would be able to talk things not related to atwar

Support, with group chat and etc, but they're should be a limited number of groups to join, like 3 for example

Support, premium only ofc, this is something completely fine to be premium. UNLIKE GENERALS T_T

Support, may be useful xaxa.

Support. Could look like:

Support!

Bump.

Bump. This thread will die when i will!

Support

作者： Xenosapien, 04.10.2013 at 17:38

Support, premium only ofc, this is something completely fine to be premium. UNLIKE GENERALS T_T

support

Bump.

Bump.

Bump.

Bump!

Yeah ı support.

Maximus bumpus.

Bump again..

Support.

作者： Skanderbeg, 25.11.2013 at 12:09

No support.

Make a clan and invite players you want like we all do. Double-claning should be forbiden.

We aint that dumb to implement low-cost clans just because you are lazy to grind some sp.

Coalitions are different, in groups there are no CWs and that stuff..This would even help to play tournament matches imo, so I can know if there's someone to play against. I can get everyone to join my cln, just to talk.

I think you miss the point Tito. A Group cannot fight CW's, a group should likely be organized like your friendlist in-game. So you can chat with those people, see their online status etc. It is not about representating any group in a game you play. It's a major difference to a coalition. You fight wars for your coalition, you play with your coalitions banner.

Let's say I like creating maps, I would like to share my thoughts with people that also create maps and I could do so by joining a mapper coalition. But I don't want to join a coalition which is all about maps because I like also the competition in the game. So while joining an active playing coalition I could also be in the group of mappers and be able to share and talk with them, this has nothing to do with cln business or being "to lazy to grind SP" as you said before (whatever this had to do in the context of groups). This centralization of thoughts is only partly possible on the current state of social interacting inside the game.

I don't see it as crucial feature, but sure a feature that would be nice to see.

Has been suggested before, but a lot people disagreed with it: http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3572

I completely agree with it, as stated in the old suggestion.

Bump