What update would you like to see the most?

"Reset Moves" Button = Cancel Move Option

A better "X"/cancel movement option. Like RMB=cancel move.

Cancel movement after saving turn would be cool

作者： Sid, 02.07.2019 at 02:41

.

"UNDO AND REDO" option FOR MOVES!

作者： Conscious Huarck, 02.07.2019 at 05:33

作者： Sid, 02.07.2019 at 02:41

.

UNDO AND REDO FOR MOVES!

That's what i meant to put...

"Fix map maker" is too much of a generalization, I think only a few certain aspects of it need to be prioritized in the map editor
For example

-Make buildings actually create-able in the editor
-Change unit stats restrictions or revamp stats restrictions (where it stands right now it's hard to integrate certain strategies into maps cause you have to resort to making a unit "Unit: other" which doesn't apply to any strategies due to the restrictions on unit stats)
-Fix random transparent borders when you create a border. For some reason when you create a border it's automatically transparent and not visible unless you re-upload the map. (I personally prefer transparent borders but I think it should be an option only)
-ADD NEUTRAL EVENTS BACK TO THE SCENARIO EDITOR: For gods sake I don't know why this was left out of the scenario editor, but there should be an option to add events to neutrals instead of regular players, this is a MAJOR reason why the html5 editor is lacking in comparison to the silverlight one
-Delete map: It's impossible to delete maps right now and I have like 10 different maps with random names(I wanted to reserve the game name for the finished product) because they're maps I can't use and I can't change their backgrounds to a working one so i just wanted to end up removing but deleting html5 maps isn't an option

-Color slider in scenario editor: Change the slider's default settings:

Where I highlighted the 1 in this color code, it should NOT be 1 by default. The 1 in this is what causes every html5 scenario to have horribly hideous and bright colors when it's hosted and it's abysmal to look at.

The default setting should be like this image above, it should be 0.5 instead of 1. The 0.5 in the color code makes it actually a tolerable color when hosted. Most scenario makers don't know this and use default opacity causing the map to look awful and the colors to be hideously lighter than they should be.

I think these are the map maker's major faults that should be prioritized more than anything else.

作者： Black Vortex, 02.07.2019 at 06:40

"Fix map maker" is too much of a generalization, I think only a few certain aspects of it need to be prioritized in the map editor
For example

-Make buildings actually create-able in the editor
-Change unit stats restrictions or revamp stats restrictions (where it stands right now it's hard to integrate certain strategies into maps cause you have to resort to making a unit "Unit: other" which doesn't apply to any strategies due to the restrictions on unit stats)
-Fix random transparent borders when you create a border. For some reason when you create a border it's automatically transparent and not visible unless you re-upload the map. (I personally prefer transparent borders but I think it should be an option only)
-ADD NEUTRAL EVENTS BACK TO THE EDITOR: For gods sake I don't know why this was left out of the scenario editor, but there should be an option to add events to neutrals instead of regular players, this is a MAJOR reason why the html5 editor is lacking in comparison to the silverlight one
-Delete map: It's impossible to delete maps right now and I have like 10 different maps with random names(I wanted to reserve the game name for the finished product) because they're maps I can't use and I can't change their backgrounds to a working one so i just wanted to end up removing but deleting html5 maps isn't an option

-Color slider in scenario editor: Change the slider's default settings:

Where I highlighted the 1 in this color code, it should NOT be 1 by default. The 1 in this is what causes every html5 scenario to have horribly hideous and bright colors when it's hosted and it's abysmal to look at.

The default setting should be like this image above, it should be 0.5 instead of 1. The 0.5 in the color code makes it actually a tolerable color when hosted. Most scenario makers don't know this and use default transparency causing the map to look awful and the colors to be hideously lighter than they should be.

I think these are the map maker's major faults that should be prioritized more than anything else.

That's a lot of stuff so... like to generalize... fix the map maker?

引句:

作者： Sid, 02.07.2019 at 06:42

That's a lot of stuff so... like to generalize... just fix the map editor?

Nah, there's actually a lot more I haven't even talked about that could be tackled like: "ghost borders", how commander units in the editor are worthless and doesn't even give same buffs as general(it only gives air buffs), deleting borders without having to delete the country first(so you can keep cities, and income intact), the bug where borders shift when you zoom in/out. Etc
There's so many issues with it, I feel it'd take some time weeding out the bugs that time would be taken away from other updates from the game. If the ones I listed were hit first people wouldn't constantly complain about it in forums

We want insurgency back

作者： Alphamon, 02.07.2019 at 07:10

We want insurgency back

counter-insurgency*

I would say preset settings, cause it's annoying to set the same settings all the time when u just want to play a 3n3

Also being able to start a 2n2 cw (cw kind of dead now but still)

作者： Sid, 02.07.2019 at 02:41

"Reset Moves" Button = Cancel Move Option

moves != move
notice the s

Furthermore, I consider that NWE must be destroyed

All of the above

Replay Battles

New upgrades and unlockables with Strategy Points and Protocoins

Obviously the editor would bring in the most people, and is about the only reason for casuals to buy premium. The rest of this is only satisfactory to the eastablished competative community.

Edit: except radio <3

作者： Alphamon, 02.07.2019 at 07:10

We want insurgency back

Yes. Because I liked counter insurgence, and there is no counter insurgence if there is no insurgence, which is sad, cuz I like cheap planes.:(

What would "Balance Buildings" even do? If you built in Pisa, would your buildings no longer lean like they should, or are they supposed to bring in more money? Sid, please explain.

I'd say advertise the game so we can have more players and plays, but i guess 'updates' are more important.

I manage the Social Media for atWar and I can tell you that the demand out there is for a proper mobile version of the game.

作者： Superhero, 02.07.2019 at 12:06

I manage the Social Media for atWar and I can tell you that the demand out there is for a proper mobile version of the game.

There are hundreds of that type of game.

作者： Superhero, 02.07.2019 at 12:06

I manage the Social Media for atWar and I can tell you that the demand out there is for a proper mobile version of the game.

Strong hooooooldddddd

作者： Helly, 02.07.2019 at 12:47

作者： Superhero, 02.07.2019 at 12:06

I manage the Social Media for atWar and I can tell you that the demand out there is for a proper mobile version of the game.

There are hundreds of that type of game.

Absolute rubbish, but thanks for being negative

Priority should be bringing back old maps that are broken. Like 2nd Punic War, Return of the King etc.

As long as the pool of good playable maps keeps decreasing due to glitches that make it literally unhostable, atwar loses ever more of its value and quality.

作者： Domo, 02.07.2019 at 10:58

Replay Battles

Radio for waffel and franz zzz

Whoever voted Radio, please, your voting rights should be revoked.

Mapmaker is top priority, but i'd say the undo button is such a drastic need in this game, for years, that its close to tie with mapmaker. Those 2 should be top priority. Right below that bugs should as well.

At the moment it makes more sense to fix the map editor first.
Reset button is a non-urgent QoL feature.

You naked Sid

More hot girls on Atwar lobby, please.