Should submarines be able to take cities?

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

It's because submarines are inferior race.

gee gee

作者： Al Fappino, 30.06.2015 at 09:29

It's because submarines are inferior race.

gee gee

Lmao

No cuse if they could ur MS Iceland would be overpowerd

作者： JUGERS2, 30.06.2015 at 09:30

No cuse if they could ur MS Iceland would be overpowerd

;_;.

Thats not the reason I made this poll lel.

The point is, it would definitly make MoS and GW more of an stealth strategic than it already is.
Since you can't see those submarines it will take people to deffend ports more. Since submarines already help in battles with marines included, I wondered why can't they take cities by them self.

Submarines cheap and stronk so i think it would be op

Submarines usually work down deep in the sea, while destroyers and transport doesn't.

作者： JUGERS2, 30.06.2015 at 09:33

Submarines cheap and stronk so i think it would be op

Well its only $20 cheaper than transport. It has a capacity of 4 (upgrades + MoS/HW) and 3 (upgrades + any other strat) and 2+ for the no upgrades.

Compared that with a transport with capacity 10+ without upgrades and 15+ with upgrades with same amount of HP/range/view/crit. Only the attack and def of transports is way lower, but thats the point of transport :p. To transport, not to fight.

Compared to destroyers it is $50 cheaper but has a slightly lower attack and deffensse.

作者： clovis1122, 30.06.2015 at 09:34

Submarines usually work down deep in the sea, while destroyers and transport doesn't.

You know submarines land on the ground when beached? And since they do attack port cities but only not take it, I think it should be able to conquor a city

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:38

作者： JUGERS2, 30.06.2015 at 09:33

Submarines cheap and stronk so i think it would be op

Well its only $20 cheaper than transport. It has a capacity of 4 (upgrades + MoS/HW) and 3 (upgrades + any other strat) and 2+ for the no upgrades.

Compared that with a transport with capacity 10+ without upgrades and 15+ with upgrades with same amount of HP/range/view/crit. Only the attack and def of transports is way lower, but thats the point of transport :p. To transport, not to fight.

Compared to destroyers it is $50 cheaper but has a slightly lower attack and deffensse.

But the have and big advantage cuse the stealth...u can never know where they are...that make them better than transports/destroyeder

作者： JUGERS2, 30.06.2015 at 09:41

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:38

作者： JUGERS2, 30.06.2015 at 09:33

Submarines cheap and stronk so i think it would be op

Well its only $20 cheaper than transport. It has a capacity of 4 (upgrades + MoS/HW) and 3 (upgrades + any other strat) and 2+ for the no upgrades.

Compared that with a transport with capacity 10+ without upgrades and 15+ with upgrades with same amount of HP/range/view/crit. Only the attack and def of transports is way lower, but thats the point of transport :p. To transport, not to fight.

Compared to destroyers it is $50 cheaper but has a slightly lower attack and deffensse.

But the have and big advantage cuse the stealth...u can never know where they are...that make them better than transports/destroyeder

That is the point of sub(marines) ?

Submarine are support unit they aren't destroyer then can fend a port from invader

作者： Htin, 30.06.2015 at 09:46

Submarine are support unit they aren't destroyer then can fend a port from invader

I am almost sure they are not support units. The support units are Sentry planes, Air transports, Naval transport and the general. That is noticeable because of the low amount of attack/deffense. Submarine has a pretty decent attack/deffense this puts them into another catagory.

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:49

作者： Htin, 30.06.2015 at 09:46

Submarine are support unit they aren't destroyer then can fend a port from invader

They are sure as not support units. The support units are Sentry planes, Air transports, Naval transport and the general. That is noticeable because of the low amount of attack/deffense. Submarine has a pretty decent attack/deffense this puts them into another catagory.

they are support unit they act as transport for marine. sinking transport. and good for view range since they stealth and get near enemy

作者： Htin, 30.06.2015 at 09:52

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:49

作者： Htin, 30.06.2015 at 09:46

Submarine are support unit they aren't destroyer then can fend a port from invader

They are sure as not support units. The support units are Sentry planes, Air transports, Naval transport and the general. That is noticeable because of the low amount of attack/deffense. Submarine has a pretty decent attack/deffense this puts them into another catagory.

they are support unit they act as transport for marine. sinking transport. and good for view range since they stealth and get near enemy

Hmm, idk Im not sure

They should with MoS.

作者： The Tactician, 30.06.2015 at 10:00

They should with MoS.

Because Mauzer would use them to cap Berlin.

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:41

作者： clovis1122, 30.06.2015 at 09:34

Submarines usually work down deep in the sea, while destroyers and transport doesn't.

You know submarines land on the ground when beached? And since they do attack port cities but only not take it, I think it should be able to conquor a city

Beached not related to attack..... They can attack from deep sea. Destroyers and transport can't.

I agree if we can make bombers and stealths take cities too cos at this point why not

作者： notserral, 30.06.2015 at 13:04

I agree if we can make bombers and stealths take cities too cos at this point why not

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

作者： Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

作者： Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

That's the point of the submarine, to sneak up on ppl liek HEY SURPRISE IT'S A NUCLEAR SUB GET FUCKED

Transports can take cities

作者： Dereny, 01.07.2015 at 00:27

Transports can take cities

Hahahaha same reaction when I was rank 6 and found transports can take cities
+ I was happy as hell and made 10 transports in one game just to go in narbs empty cities

作者： Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

作者： The Tactician, 01.07.2015 at 04:02

作者： Netre, 30.06.2015 at 17:02

作者： Waffel, 30.06.2015 at 09:28

Destroyers, Transports can take it too. I wonder why submarines cant?

cause none of the population would know it was there.
tis too hard to take over when noone know's your there.

marines do the same, its kinda what ''stealth'' is for

and yea, empty transports is the least reasonable thing to take cities because an empty weaponless ship poses no threat. If they can take cities then weaponized subs should too. At least with MoS.

Ikr? I think alot of people dont know Submarines have like rockets and stuff ;_;?

作者： Goblin, 30.06.2015 at 10:37

Because Mauzer would use them to cap Berlin.

作者： Croat, 01.07.2015 at 02:18

作者： Dereny, 01.07.2015 at 00:27

Transports can take cities

Hahahaha same reaction when I was rank 6 and found transports can take cities
+ I was happy as hell and made 10 transports in one game just to go in narbs empty cities

XD my mind was just blown