Slight buff for RA?

In my opinion i believe that RA is too weak. I base this on comparing it to imperialist which reduces the cost of the tank and bomber to the same cost as RA does. RA is very very similar to imperialist if you think about it
The units.
RA tank has 1 more attack than the imperialist one and 1 more range and has same cost therefore it is stronger in attack slightly
The RA bomber has 130 cost and has 1 less defense than the imperialist one but has 1 more attack which due to bombers use is slightly stronger
Imperialist using only tank and bomber can be seen as a weaker RA but when you consider defense ....
RA militia is 40 cost which is expensive as ****
RA infantry is useless at 10 less cost to RA tanks for basically a lot less attack it is not commonly used in what i have seen (please contradict me if this is wrong)
Whereas imperialist has 10 cost militia which are useful if money is low or to get a unit advantage
Imperialist infantry are weak in attack (3) but are at a cost of 30 and can be used for defense (6 defense)
Imperialist transports are 30 cheaper than RA ones.
Because of all this RA is nearly redundant in my opinion as its expensive and cant defend


-10 cost to militia seems to be a good buff that doesn't totally change the game but allows some defense

If there are any errors in this please tell me and i can change it
I would like to hear other peoples opinions on RA

TL DR: my opinion is that RA is inferior to imperialist in nearly all ways and should be buffed either through not so high cost militia or maybe 1 extra defense to tanks or adding 1 hp to tanks and removing the 1 range given

Maybe increase the critical chance of tanks by 10%?

The whole point of RA is to be always attacking, defense is expensive to keep you from defending efficiently what you gain. Imperialist units have 1 less attack in everything, so it is debatebly the worst attacking strat, which is what Ra is good at. Seems like your buffs would make it pretty broken, mabye like -10 cost to militia if anything just so upkeep doesnt kill your tanks

The only change I support is removing 10 cost from militia. Everything else would pretty much break the game play.

Bring the old RA back.

作者： dinoscout, 09.05.2016 at 20:45

The whole point of RA is to be always attacking, defense is expensive to keep you from defending efficiently what you gain. Imperialist units have 1 less attack in everything, so it is debatebly the worst attacking strat, which is what Ra is good at. Seems like your buffs would make it pretty broken, mabye like -10 cost to militia if anything just so upkeep doesnt kill your tanks

Exaclty the whole point of RA is attacking yet it doesnt give tanks any attack boost yet it gives to destroyers looooooooooool.So buff RA or remove +1 def from infs in PD and add it in Destroyers.Same logic.I mean RA vs PD now it doesnt stand a chance because enemy has inf with 7def and 4att and 50cost and you have tanks with 8att and 4def at 90coins.

Right now, RA is a bit weak... tryied it and tanks aren't that efficient in order to carry you the game. Gets outplayed by many other strategies easily. Tanks should be stronger in my opinion if we really want to have a strategy called "RELENTLESS ATTACK". Otherwise, call it Merciful Attack.

作者： RaulPB, 10.05.2016 at 12:45

Right now, RA is a bit weak... tryied it and tanks aren't that efficient in order to carry you the game. Gets outplayed by many other strategies easily. Tanks should be stronger in my opinion if we really want to have a strategy called "RELENTLESS ATTACK". Otherwise, call it Merciful Attack.

^ He does have a point + I support my clannies idea

作者： RaulPB, 10.05.2016 at 12:45

Right now, RA is a bit weak... tryied it and tanks aren't that efficient in order to carry you the game. Gets outplayed by many other strategies easily. Tanks should be stronger in my opinion if we really want to have a strategy called "RELENTLESS ATTACK". Otherwise, call it Merciful Attack.

BUMP.

RA definately needs urgent atention.

RA needs buff.Remove +10 cost for mil and inf keep -1 def for both and add +1 att to tanks.

作者： clovis1122, 18.09.2015 at 09:16

I prognosticate RA destroyers will become the most useless units, even bypassing standard helicopters. Wait and see..

作者： clovis1122, 16.05.2016 at 10:22

作者： clovis1122, 18.09.2015 at 09:16

I prognosticate RA destroyers will become the most useless units, even bypassing standard helicopters. Wait and see..

most useless unit is RA militia not that DDs go back.

+10 cost for mil is an evil idea that laochra and eagle thought to kill RA.

作者： Nations, 16.05.2016 at 10:46

作者： clovis1122, 16.05.2016 at 10:22

作者： clovis1122, 18.09.2015 at 09:16

I prognosticate RA destroyers will become the most useless units, even bypassing standard helicopters. Wait and see..

most useless unit is RA militia not that DDs go back.

You'd still need to buy militias for defense as RA.

... but in almost every situation where you can use RA destroyers, you're better off by going sea trans + tanks.

I agree, RA is not useful anymore even when you are supposed to attack.
RA needs a slight buff imo.

Yes

作者： Zephyrusu, 10.05.2016 at 11:13

Bring the old RA back.

if you mean the old old ra then sure.

-10 cost militia , +1 atack to tanks

Militia cost is a very powerful thing that lots of people don't notice, because (as I have said before), upkeep cost depends on unit cost. With RA at the moment you're paying lots of extra upkeep on useless militia that you got for free, and I think this is hurting the strat quite a bit. Reducing to 30 seems sensible.

Also, long time ago RA tanks had 110 cost +1 attack, +1 defence, +1 range and a bit more crit or something. It was weak but if we bring back the old tank stats leaving the range at +2 and the destroyer and bomber boosts then it should be mostly ok. If it still seemed a bit weak then we could remove the cost nerf on militia and see how it goes.

Fuck RA. stop cry

Buff ra fuck faffel in the arse

RA doesn't need boost. Here is proof:

Buff RA.It needs to have strong tanks(+1 att) and weak def.So -1def for inf and militias.Remove that retarted +10 cost for militia that gets you bankrupt turn 3.

Would buffing RA change the competitive playing?

Bump
Give me 1 situation you would use relentless attack
also
Iron fist tanks are stronger than Ra tanks
skymenace makes bombers as good as tanks in attack and defence and have higher range and can fly
pd has much cheaper infantry to RA tanks and win battles 1:1

作者： triangle., 01.08.2016 at 17:15

Bump
Give me 1 situation you would use relentless attack

none

RA is trash

Support

The militia cost nerf is going to be removed, i asked ivan a while back when i left the modteam along with 2 or 3 other changes. He said he'd get to them.

And rename it tank general like it should be.

作者： boywind2, 02.08.2016 at 00:19

And rename it tank general like it should be.