獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 5   誰瀏覽過: 48 users
10.07.2015 - 10:23
載入中...
載入中...
10.07.2015 - 10:29
----
載入中...
載入中...
10.07.2015 - 10:43
作者: minusSeven, 10.07.2015 at 10:29



It makes hybrid warfare into a decentralized blob that depends on the tricks and the location of the player's general.

Infantry are weak and it just barely holds on its own, but it has valuable assets of irregular warfare. For example, Militia are walking tanks (in defense only) so recently taken countries are strong enough to hold, but need to be reinforced with more militia or infantry like in all other strats.
Tanks are the perfect offensive unit, but can't hold by themselves so they depend on the main defensive unit which maybe a combination of infantry and marines, because marines take the role of infantry in this strategy, they are literally stealth infantry.

Air units are useless, but the land-related penalties added to Hybrid warfare can be removed by using the general, so surprise attacks can be devastating against opponents.

In contrast with the old HW (in which the bottle neck was money), the bottleneck of this one is units.
載入中...
載入中...
12.07.2015 - 17:30
Can I make up my own strategy and call it hybrid warfare?
----


載入中...
載入中...
12.07.2015 - 20:38
作者: Sultan of Swing, 12.07.2015 at 17:30

Can I make up my own strategy and call it hybrid warfare?

Yes, anything is better than the original hybrid warfare.
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!