獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 22   誰瀏覽過: 118 users
30.09.2014 - 03:35
What I am trying to suggest here is an idea that was brought up by different players over time. I changed it a bit because seprate room for this type of an idea is most likely never going to happen.

So the content of the idea is to have an option for mods to assign which custom maps and scenarios should decrease in sp revenue, the mods can also choose how much of %(ranging from, say 5 to 20) sp they decrease based on some factors and cricumstances.
載入中...
載入中...
30.09.2014 - 05:34
In order for this kind of measure to be fair, the mods have to agree on some universal and judicial standard of map/scenario SP-reduction. Personally, I think that has the proverbial snowball's chance in hell.

I suggest that the SP-reduction be mathematically calculated by the income/reinforcement numbers of that map, in case of a scenario, the map on which that scenario is based on, or, in case of a preset, the total income/reinforcement numbers of the countries in the preset, using a formula similar to that used to determine acquire country cost.

So a map that's doubly as large will yield half the SP, a map that's half as large will yield double the SP, and so on.
載入中...
載入中...
30.09.2014 - 07:07
I agree with your suggestion.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
載入中...
載入中...
30.09.2014 - 07:27
Death1812
帳戶已刪除
作者: International, 30.09.2014 at 05:34

In order for this kind of measure to be fair, the mods have to agree on some universal and judicial standard of map/scenario SP-reduction. Personally, I think that has the proverbial snowball's chance in hell.

I suggest that the SP-reduction be mathematically calculated by the income/reinforcement numbers of that map, in case of a scenario, the map on which that scenario is based on, or, in case of a preset, the total income/reinforcement numbers of the countries in the preset, using a formula similar to that used to determine acquire country cost.

So a map that's doubly as large will yield half the SP, a map that's half as large will yield double the SP, and so on.


support
載入中...
載入中...
30.09.2014 - 07:55
Support.
載入中...
載入中...
30.09.2014 - 20:03
作者: International, 30.09.2014 at 05:34

In order for this kind of measure to be fair, the mods have to agree on some universal and judicial standard of map/scenario SP-reduction. Personally, I think that has the proverbial snowball's chance in hell.

I suggest that the SP-reduction be mathematically calculated by the income/reinforcement numbers of that map, in case of a scenario, the map on which that scenario is based on, or, in case of a preset, the total income/reinforcement numbers of the countries in the preset, using a formula similar to that used to determine acquire country cost.

So a map that's doubly as large will yield half the SP, a map that's half as large will yield double the SP, and so on.

Not "only" income, reinforcement, number of countries and number of cities, but also scenario unit drops and the characteristics of the units (cost, crit, HP, Def, Att, etc.), since they influence the SP obtained from battles.
----
載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 03:04
作者: Columna Durruti, 30.09.2014 at 20:03

Not "only" income, reinforcement, number of countries and number of cities, but also scenario unit drops and the characteristics of the units (cost, crit, HP, Def, Att, etc.), since they influence the SP obtained from battles.

An excellent point. But I'm not quite sure how those variables can be factored in. Trying to compare relative cost, critical, health, defense, attack, range, capacity, view range, stealth detection range, and collateral for each of the dozens of units scenarios tends to have sounds like a mathematical nightmare.
載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 06:18
...or simply put a max SP/turn ratio!
----
載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 06:25
作者: Columna Durruti, 01.10.2014 at 06:18

...or simply put a max SP/turn ratio!


That works too, I guess...
The highest I've ever earned in a default map game is around 50SP per turn, so, say, 280SP per game plus 40SP per turn. So 320SP maximum for a 1-turn game, 360SP maximum for a 2-turn game, 680SP maximum for a 10-turn game, etc.
載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 08:35
作者: International, 01.10.2014 at 06:25

作者: Columna Durruti, 01.10.2014 at 06:18

...or simply put a max SP/turn ratio!


That works too, I guess...
The highest I've ever earned in a default map game is around 50SP per turn, so, say, 280SP per game plus 40SP per turn. So 320SP maximum for a 1-turn game, 360SP maximum for a 2-turn game, 680SP maximum for a 10-turn game, etc.


just for the info. the value of the SP per turn should increase, since the longer the game, the more SP you usually get (more fights and bigger fights each turn)
----




載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 11:54
No support, sorry the way it is seems fine too me.
----
載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 15:38
This has to be done for RP.
----
It's not the end.

載入中...
載入中...
01.10.2014 - 16:50
作者: Mr_Own_U, 01.10.2014 at 15:38

This has to be done for RP.

support
----
Everyone is living a myth and it's important to know what yours is. It could be a tragedy- and maybe you don't want it to be.
載入中...
載入中...
03.10.2014 - 00:25
Black Shark
帳戶已刪除
Support, cause RP
載入中...
載入中...
03.10.2014 - 00:50
Wow wow, such RP-hate...
...
well, none of my business.

作者: Safari, 01.10.2014 at 08:35

just for the info. the value of the SP per turn should increase, since the longer the game, the more SP you usually get (more fights and bigger fights each turn)


Then maybe some kind of a quadratic function for length of the game.
Say, one-half of the square of the number of turns in the game, in addition to 50SP per player in that game (players who abandon the game will not count towards this total).

So a player fighting a 10-turn 3v3 can walk away with a maximum of 350 SP,

a player fighting a 25-turn 10-player world can walk away with a maximum of 813 SP,

a player fighting a 10-turn 20-player mayhem can walk away with a maximum of 1050 SP,

and a player fighting a 20-player 500-turn world game where there were 19 late joiners per every 3 turns of the game (the theoretical largest game you can possibly have as of now, I think) can walk away with a maximum of 283,700 SP.

Good? Horrible and pointless?
Please comment.
載入中...
載入中...
16.10.2014 - 17:55
No support

i do not have faith in the mods or the community to do this fairly
----


載入中...
載入中...
16.10.2014 - 18:09
作者: OKELEUK, 16.10.2014 at 17:55

No support

i do not have faith in the mods or the community to do this fairly

I don't. Not in this issue. There is a thin line between SP farming and SP boosted maps. The only way to bring transparency and SP-fairness back to AW is to nerf/boost SP for certain maps. It is being worked on.
----
載入中...
載入中...
19.10.2014 - 07:27
Pertamax
----
載入中...
載入中...
29.01.2016 - 12:48
Ghost
帳戶已刪除
Why you care, you log in to chat not to play D
載入中...
載入中...
29.01.2016 - 15:19
Hdrakon4mod
----





作者: Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
載入中...
載入中...
29.01.2016 - 17:17
作者: Waffel, 29.01.2016 at 15:19

-snip!-

----
載入中...
載入中...
30.01.2016 - 03:52
作者: Columna Durruti, 29.01.2016 at 17:17

作者: Waffel, 29.01.2016 at 15:19

-snip!-



hahahah, but i am not german though ;_;
----





作者: Guest14502, 11.10.2014 at 09:44

Waffel for mod 2015
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!