Biggwall problems.
發表: 457
誰瀏覽過: 244 users
You know im tired of this shit.
People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.
And if people WF the bigg wall turn 1, without attacking their capital, and just wf it turn 2 too they get mad. Lmao.
I don't get this logic-.-?
Only because you lose 5 extra troops (which isnt that 'big of a deal) since you can easily expand with ukraine/turkey/spain/germany/uk without those 5 units, with france most of the people choose to not rush italy so they wont take a big damage at all by losing those 5 extra troops. You guys use this excuse just to approve this wall, it isnt legit...
The turns your capital is walled (turn 1 and 2) you get way more profit then losing those 5 troops. by having an extra turn without protecting your capital you have a way bigger advantage then just losing 5 troops in turn 1.
If people say, we will wf first turn 1 because its not fair that we cant open your wall on turn 2, and kinda get a freepass to expand/attack when the opponent/enemy needs to focus on his BROKEN wall + trying to hold the expanding guy who still has his capital walled + trying to deffend....
Only because some people feel like playing this game, its not a reason to say :''If they do it, you do it too'' because thats just beyond stupid.. if people want to play this way, go ahead but dont expect people to like it and accept it. Wall is to prevent getting capped FOR THAT TURN. if you wall like this to prevent it from 2 turns walled, dont cry if people wf just to make it 1 turn.
People use this bigg wall turn 1, and triangle wall turn 2. Its unfair to the other people who cant open the capital wall for 2 turns.
And if people WF the bigg wall turn 1, without attacking their capital, and just wf it turn 2 too they get mad. Lmao.
I don't get this logic-.-?
Only because you lose 5 extra troops (which isnt that 'big of a deal) since you can easily expand with ukraine/turkey/spain/germany/uk without those 5 units, with france most of the people choose to not rush italy so they wont take a big damage at all by losing those 5 extra troops. You guys use this excuse just to approve this wall, it isnt legit...
The turns your capital is walled (turn 1 and 2) you get way more profit then losing those 5 troops. by having an extra turn without protecting your capital you have a way bigger advantage then just losing 5 troops in turn 1.
If people say, we will wf first turn 1 because its not fair that we cant open your wall on turn 2, and kinda get a freepass to expand/attack when the opponent/enemy needs to focus on his BROKEN wall + trying to hold the expanding guy who still has his capital walled + trying to deffend....
Only because some people feel like playing this game, its not a reason to say :''If they do it, you do it too'' because thats just beyond stupid.. if people want to play this way, go ahead but dont expect people to like it and accept it. Wall is to prevent getting capped FOR THAT TURN. if you wall like this to prevent it from 2 turns walled, dont cry if people wf just to make it 1 turn.
I gave you a picture of my big wall and inner wall inside. You said that it cant be broken ...wtf are you saying now? Make up your fuckin mind. And read what i said ...in my last sentence you trolling fuck.
---- 
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 70012 帳戶已刪除 |
Or.... You could ask if big walls are allowed, if not then the guy makes 2 layer walls. Here is the thing goblin: i don't get why you are against big wall + rewall, when it has the same effect as a 2 layer wall or a simple rewall.
載入中...
載入中...
|
And as I said if they wallfuck your outer wall by purpose or accidentally, they would still break your inner wall. Both you and desu say that is right if: > you wallfuck someone outer wall. > he dont have inner wall. > you wallfuck his capital. But what I am saiding is: > you wallfuck someone outer wall. > he have inner wall. > you break his inner wall.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 70012 帳戶已刪除 |
"Big wall" + a capital wall (turn 2) = cap unbroken until turn 3. 1 layer of wall + capital wall = cap unbroken until turn 3. Capital re-wall (succeful) = cap unbroken until turn 3. So, plz tell me: what is the big fuzz about? EDITED: changed turn 4 to turn 3, the point still stands.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
I simply agree with this. 2 layer wall is same as big wall + rewall. So if you are against that big wall, how could you agree with 2 layer wall '' 2 layer wall is the bigg wall turn 1 with 3 unitsi n capital right? just like goblin said he didnt mind that.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 278994 帳戶已刪除 |
10 pages impressive, also gob and waff, you know youre in the wrong when both me and clovis are on the same page. this almost never happens.
---- 
載入中...
載入中...
|
Black Shark 帳戶已刪除 |
|
I have wrote that several times ...you really dont read. Simple rewall - can be prevented Big wall rewall - cant be prevented
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
No, im seriously concerned for your mental state when you say you are on the same page as clovis. And you are all being assholes, because you dont read what im writting, but instead just come here and burst out same old story you said milion times. I said i would be happy with you guys leaving 3 units in your capital while making a big wall if you really are concerned about both walls breaking. I gave you an idea how we could make 1st turn wf useless. Nothing read, nothing commented, just same old retarded posting and insulting me. Then you get all shocked when i tell you all to go fuck yourself.
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 278994 帳戶已刪除 |
[pr] Goblin: will remember have you all acted in that topic ...you and your lackies, dont speak to me again i never even once insulted you, but whatever. i wonder if i can train these alleged lackies to make me sandwiches...
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 70012 帳戶已刪除 |
In other words, goblin is not consistent with his arguments, and his arguments are based on ignorance and deception.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Black Shark 帳戶已刪除 |
|
|
Retarded thread. I just don't see the problem with rewalling or big walls. If anything it is a skill in the game. In ultimate world war 2 sometimes I would find opponents making 3 big walls around caps but I never had a problem breaking their cap by turn4. Making big walls takes skill yes but they are breakable by 4 turns. About rewalling well its an age old problem, lots of people have been against it but lots of lovers of rewalling as well. Thing is it is difficult to prove rewalling from the game mechanics. I personally don't have anything against it and think it should be used in games.
---- 
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
I am not buying this part. I don't think more people are against it. Can you prove they are against it ? Maybe make a poll and ask people to vote to prove your point.
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
[pr] Goblin: You played 2 mins turkey.... Dont talk to me again + dont join my duels.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Oh you want me to SS every conversation I had in AW only so you can get proof because you''dont'' buy it? If you don't buy it, Like I care about that lol. I was already wondering when you would come with your negative vibes here. Took you long tho.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Can you shut up? you and all these people who go off-topic are ruining this post.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
If you find this thread useless or retarded or whatever you call it, dont even read or waste your attention on it. And as sure as hell dont respond to it if your mainreason is to go off-topic. Thanks.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
And also, if you really want your truth, here is a SS of an sure guy called clovis who is commenting in this post that he 'supports' the rewall after he told me he didn't like it :p lol. 
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Waffel starting a topic that will flame Laochra being anal as usual People responding to Laochra being anal Khal posting funny shit in response to responses about Laochra being anal Goblin saying stupid shit Laochra being anal about Goblin saying stupid shit Tunder being passive agreesive Occasional decent comment from mods Nice to see the faggots being faggots as usual. Anything new happen over the past month I should be aware about?
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Im pregnant. Its your child.
載入中...
載入中...
|
You are the one making the claim so you have to find the evidence. That's the way it is in real world. Also all your posts here are idiotic you should try to be more logical. Mods please lock this thread ~!
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Excuse me? All my posts here are idiotic? Lol? If it was so, this thread would have been locked already. Giving your opinion about something is obviously idiotic in your mind. If you dont like me fine, but dont come here and trying to start a flamewar or ruining a post. Who do you think you are? Like forreal? you come here and tell everybody what to do? If you simply dont like this thread, its verry clear you could just click on the exit button? Like wow. This whole attitude of you, thinking you can choose who can make the threads here and who don't is beyond dickerish behaviour.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Black Shark 帳戶已刪除 |
|
This thread was on page 10 before I commented on it, so it obviously a flame war before I started commenting on it. Ironically you started it and you say I started flame war ....  I just told you what I think of this thread. And reading all the posts I have difficulty finding people who actually agree with you.
----
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Eh, so because its a 10 pages long thread it must be a flame war? Nice logic. Just to reminder, this wasn't a flame war till the 7 pages, when khal insulted both me and goblin. And now you are calling my thread and comments idiotic because you simply dont agreee with it. I think you have cant really speak for the mods or this thread if you say it must be locked or not, if you want to discuss about this subject go for it. If you don't dont go here and start making up trouble just to see it locked. Its a really low way of just locking something you dont agree with. Also i think you need to re-read if you actually want to see who agreed with me. Because some people did.  Have fun minus, i hope this satisfies your day.
載入中...
載入中...
|
Deleted User 150025 帳戶已刪除 |
Look the thing is. They can bigwall + rewall as much as they want, Just not turn 1 and 2. Since the no wf rule on turn 1, makes it impossible to counter the wall for 1 and 2 turns. Understand? So the only way to prevent this rewall on turn 2, is to WF the bigg wall on turn 1, and WF his capital (the inner wall) on turn 2. I know it sounds a bit difficult but if you understand it, you'll get my point. If you don't you simply have an other opinion about it, and I respect it. But dont start like minus, calling this an idiotic thread with idiotic people and idiotic comments.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
載入中...
載入中...
|
right!
