Choose reinforcements' turn

Wouldn't it be cool if the host could choose the number of turns that it takes to receive new troops?
Let me explain:It takes 3 turns to be able to buy new troops,but what if the host could change this?
I am pretty sure that the High Ranks would love to play a hard game where you only receive troops in 4,5... turns.(5 seems to be insane to me,but 4,not that much)
However,The host will not be able to choose 1 or 2,otherwise the game'll get quite easy.
So,it's basically like this:You can choose between 3 or 4 turns to get new troops.

I support, that actually sounds good.

Upvote

Everyone goes if to save troop count XD

On 1 hand it sounds interesting.
On the other, it could get not just confusing (trying to remember for every game which turn is reinf week without checking settings menu will be a pain), but the option to change the settings would be most likely available only for premiums. Which means you won't be able to use your own setting proposal. Also, it'll be a lot of unnecessary and time consuming coding for Ivan and Amok who are already overworked and overdue on the map editor. So yeah.
The cons outweigh the pros so I'll say no.

Agree

4 turns every reinf should be the minimum and host can set it higher than that.
Anything lower is an incentive to farm. World 50k or RP with reinf every turn would be very bad

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 07:40

4 turns every reinf should be the minimum and host can set it higher than that.
Anything lower is an incentive to farm. World 50k or RP with reinf every turn would be very bad

Anything lower and you'd go broke pretty quick. Higher, and your troops would just be sitting there in 1s and 2s across your territory waiting for reinfs that are never coming. In Europe Turley will be pretty well off, but Ukraine ends up using all its reinfs by turn 3. It'd be screwed in a longer reinfs turn game.

作者： Darth., 30.03.2016 at 08:48

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 07:40

4 turns every reinf should be the minimum and host can set it higher than that.
Anything lower is an incentive to farm. World 50k or RP with reinf every turn would be very bad

Anything lower and you'd go broke pretty quick. Higher, and your troops would just be sitting there in 1s and 2s across your territory waiting for reinfs that are never coming. In Europe Turley will be pretty well off, but Ukraine ends up using all its reinfs by turn 3. It'd be screwed in a longer reinfs turn game.

50k farms.......

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 09:11

作者： Darth., 30.03.2016 at 08:48

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 07:40

4 turns every reinf should be the minimum and host can set it higher than that.
Anything lower is an incentive to farm. World 50k or RP with reinf every turn would be very bad

Anything lower and you'd go broke pretty quick. Higher, and your troops would just be sitting there in 1s and 2s across your territory waiting for reinfs that are never coming. In Europe Turley will be pretty well off, but Ukraine ends up using all its reinfs by turn 3. It'd be screwed in a longer reinfs turn game.

50k farms.......

Still won't work. At least in early turns. And in later turns, being forced to use up nearly all your reinfs will leave you with empty pockets soon enough. Although it might encourage GW on a world scale.
Noobs don't know how to handle a budget. They'd screw up so bad in these type of games...

作者： Darth., 30.03.2016 at 09:14

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 09:11

作者： Darth., 30.03.2016 at 08:48

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 07:40

4 turns every reinf should be the minimum and host can set it higher than that.
Anything lower is an incentive to farm. World 50k or RP with reinf every turn would be very bad

Anything lower and you'd go broke pretty quick. Higher, and your troops would just be sitting there in 1s and 2s across your territory waiting for reinfs that are never coming. In Europe Turley will be pretty well off, but Ukraine ends up using all its reinfs by turn 3. It'd be screwed in a longer reinfs turn game.

50k farms.......

Still won't work. At least in early turns. And in later turns, being forced to use up nearly all your reinfs will leave you with empty pockets soon enough. Although it might encourage GW on a world scale.
Noobs don't know how to handle a budget. They'd screw up so bad in these type of games...

I dont think you get it. If you can set reinf every turn or every other turn, people will be able to SP farm a lot more effectively than now.

We dont want people farming thousands of sp in just a dozen turns.

If this idea was to be implemented then reinf has to at least be every four turn or put a sp multiplier for lower turn.

作者： ROYAL, 30.03.2016 at 09:43

I dont think you get it. If you can set reinf every turn or every other turn, people will be able to SP farm a lot more effectively than now.

We dont want people farming thousands of sp in just a dozen turns.

If this idea was to be implemented then reinf has to at least be every four turn or put a sp multiplier for lower turn.

You proposed a solution to your own problem.

An SP multiplier to ensure that this option cannot be used to SP-farm seems to be an obviously better choice compared to not having the option at all.

Changes the competitive look on this game, I support!

An idea, with the same concept was previously suggested by Acquiesce.

I obviously support both.

PS. Darth Millennial has no idea what he's talking about

No

Sound good

No sounds shit and any noob host would use it in his favor.Etc they just allyfag have more units than you and you die.No support this post gave me cancer.

Also gtfo world 50k.I really cant understand why you hate it so much.A theory of mine is that you dont know how to play 50k and you are too stupid to learn so you just call it "noob".World 50k requires way more micromanagement and skill than spamming infatry and moving it in a map you have played 8373529384729 times.

Europe 10k is infatry spam and same picks and same moves.Now thats noob.

作者： Nations, 01.04.2016 at 12:35

Also gtfo world 50k.I really cant understand why you hate it so much.A theory of mine is that you dont know how to play 50k and you are too stupid to learn so you just call it "noob".World 50k requires way more micromanagement and skill than spamming infatry and moving it in a map you have played 8373529384729 times.

Maybe because you need more skills,how to manage economy,and you cant spam,spam and die cuz no money.
Now gtfo,you fk up greek name on this game(KHAL GODFATHER!!!!)

作者： Oleg, 01.04.2016 at 15:05

作者： Nations, 01.04.2016 at 12:35

Also gtfo world 50k.I really cant understand why you hate it so much.A theory of mine is that you dont know how to play 50k and you are too stupid to learn so you just call it "noob".World 50k requires way more micromanagement and skill than spamming infatry and moving it in a map you have played 8373529384729 times.

Maybe because you need more skills,how to manage economy,and you cant spam,spam and die cuz no money.
Now gtfo,you fk up greek name on this game(KHAL GODFATHER!!!!)

pd doesnt need money inf costs 50

Spam

Actually, for the 1st time ever, I like this idea

Just no. You suggest to change it to 3 turns for reinforcement? Okay, that will turn SP farm maps into even bigger farms. Please use brain before agreeing on this...

I like the idea except in really does make it too easy to farm SP...unless an auto sp % reduction is set for what ever reinforcement phase you change it to if its lower than 4 and maybe a boost in SP if higher

作者： Captain Rider, 02.04.2016 at 01:22

I like the idea except in really does make it too easy to farm SP...unless an auto sp % reduction is set for what ever reinforcement phase you change it to if its lower than 4 and maybe a boost in SP if higher

Even with that, it makes no sense to apply this change. Make game more complicated just to 1 guy feel satisfied? No.

Meh,no

No, all it will do is make us check 1 extra setting and adapt to it every other game, the way it is now you always know reinf is t1 t5 t9 t13....no need for this BS

Sounds like bullshit buuuut on the other hand can be fun