獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 22   誰瀏覽過: 64 users
01.05.2015 - 11:08
 Mobster (版主)
I think there should be a votekick system. Because the trolls troll as always, here is one:

That happened many times while i play this game. If you don't resolve that, many players will get aggrieved.

By the way, many players agree with my suggestion. Please resolve this.
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:10
Support turn 39 we are still here playing
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:10
Soldier001
帳戶已刪除
I don't support this, because whenever you are winning and your enemy try to gangbang you they will just kick you in case of their defeat
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:10
It will be abused
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:12
 Mobster (版主)
In my opinion about this, soldier, The votekick system should be like this:
Only reliable players should have votekick-start option in games.
Also If someone abuses it who is in theese reliable guys, it will probably be reported. So no problem here.
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:12
I wont support this either, adding a votekick system will create more trolls, let's say if I win a war, I can get kicked by the victim and his buddies cuz I'm winning, which isnt fair, that's why a banlist exists, to keep the trolls away.
----
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:14
 opi
作者: Mobster, 01.05.2015 at 11:12

In my opinion about this, soldier, The votekick system should be like this:
Only reliable players should have votekick-start option in games.
Also If someone abuses it who is in theese reliable guys, it will probably be reported. So no problem here.


loooooool if settings says 50 turns 4 min you must be able to play this till the end gfy
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:17
作者: Mobster, 01.05.2015 at 11:12

Only reliable players should have votekick-start option in games.

Ofc, and who's gonna decide who is a reliable player?
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:20
 Mobster (版主)
Mods. Probably high ranks who plays the games not as an agressive person.
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:22
 Mobster (版主)
作者: opi, 01.05.2015 at 11:14

作者: Mobster, 01.05.2015 at 11:12

In my opinion about this, soldier, The votekick system should be like this:
Only reliable players should have votekick-start option in games.
Also If someone abuses it who is in theese reliable guys, it will probably be reported. So no problem here.


loooooool if settings says 50 turns 4 min you must be able to play this till the end gfy
We are here to resolve something which are bad to players.
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:22
I'd say we could give mods the decision to votekick.
That brit was the last player in entente and was wasting our time, we could give mods the power to votekick the player(since mods are reliable players)
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:25
作者: Mobster, 01.05.2015 at 11:20

Mods. Probably high ranks who plays the games not as an agressive person.

In that case embrace yourself for the longest judgement ever! Followed by the longest complain ever...
----
Don't ever look down on someone unless you're helping him up. Don't ever treat someone else the way you wouldn't want others to treat you.
We're all people.

載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 11:36
No support,
1/the number of reliable player is so low it would make it useless
2/there is allways some case where one player is defently lossing the game but might win after 50 turn by having the most sp, which is a fair way to win the game.
----
You win battles by knowing the enemy's timing, and using a timing which the enemy does not expect.
Miyamoto Musashi
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 12:10
Do you have a brain OP? It will be abused by low rankers and noobs just to kick high ranks.
----




TJM !!!
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 13:25
 Mobster (版主)
Uk had no chance to have more sp than Central Powers.......
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 13:56
載入中...
載入中...
01.05.2015 - 22:12
1. The Brit player was not a troll. He was playing the game, and is allowed to stay until he is defeated. That is not what we define as a troll.

2. No support for vote kick, because prone to being abused. Just like how the change setting was abused by players, so it was modified to prevent such a thing.
載入中...
載入中...
02.05.2015 - 02:25
RaYan S.K
帳戶已刪除
載入中...
載入中...
02.05.2015 - 07:53
作者: Guest, 01.05.2015 at 11:10

I don't support this, because whenever you are winning and your enemy try to gangbang you they will just kick you in case of their defeat
載入中...
載入中...
02.05.2015 - 11:00
The game is not over until it's over. I've seen people win on SP after they've been declared defeated.

No support. Not to mention it's huge potential for abuse.
載入中...
載入中...
03.05.2015 - 02:10
作者: Guest, 01.05.2015 at 11:10

I don't support this, because whenever you are winning and your enemy try to gangbang you they will just kick you in case of their defeat

^^
作者: Mobster, 01.05.2015 at 11:12

In my opinion about this, soldier, The votekick system should be like this:
Only reliable players should have votekick-start option in games.
Also If someone abuses it who is in theese reliable guys, it will probably be reported. So no problem here.

How do you get to know reliable players? How'll community add them to list?

No support!
----
載入中...
載入中...
03.05.2015 - 11:16
 brianwl (管理員)
No need for this. After a game is started and settings decided, you need to be able to commit to those settings. It's bad enough when a player gets gang-banged, but they can still win. If a player is actually trolling, make a note and don't play games with him again.
----

載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2025 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!