Verify
發表: 44
誰瀏覽過: 74 users
Suggestion: Force new players to verify their account with an email address.
EDIT4: As people tend to not like the idea of being forced to sign up, how about a set date and time where the players before this set date and time aren't required for an email. The "veterans" will have this advantage. Maybe a good set date and time would be when I created this thread, as the changes (if it happens) will be obviously in the future. But that can be up to the admins.
The reason being, is that emails can be used to log in, therefore people can only register 1 email account. This will help limit alts since people won't bother to go the extra step of setting up numerous email accounts, exception for the couple crazy people.
Many other games I've played, mainly on Steam, have this verification and it's pretty useful too. Currently users can choose if they want to keep their account safe, but I've only seen this on one other game and that was created in 2006.
EDIT: There's a reason these games are popular.
EDIT2: Found a fast smurfing email provider, for all you paranoid "I quit" peoples: http://www.gmx.co.uk/
(change to .com if you want to)
EDIT3: A nice gif:
http://i.imgur.com/jEKxvNH.gif
EDIT4: As people tend to not like the idea of being forced to sign up, how about a set date and time where the players before this set date and time aren't required for an email. The "veterans" will have this advantage. Maybe a good set date and time would be when I created this thread, as the changes (if it happens) will be obviously in the future. But that can be up to the admins.
The reason being, is that emails can be used to log in, therefore people can only register 1 email account. This will help limit alts since people won't bother to go the extra step of setting up numerous email accounts, exception for the couple crazy people.
Many other games I've played, mainly on Steam, have this verification and it's pretty useful too. Currently users can choose if they want to keep their account safe, but I've only seen this on one other game and that was created in 2006.
EDIT: There's a reason these games are popular.
EDIT2: Found a fast smurfing email provider, for all you paranoid "I quit" peoples: http://www.gmx.co.uk/
(change to .com if you want to)
EDIT3: A nice gif:
http://i.imgur.com/jEKxvNH.gif
Well, you've definitely put a lot of thought into this, and I admire that, but I'm going to stick with my original opinion 
----  "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
Stryko 帳戶已刪除
I guess you fall into this section:
載入中...
載入中...
|
You misunderstand: I'm not attacking this idea, nor do I dislike it just for the sake of doing so. I have my own reasons do differ from your opinion, but you (and anyone else who stands with you on this opinion) would take them in the wrong way.
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
|
Oh, I don't doubt it: my opinion on this is very simple: we do not require e-mails to create an account in atWar. As to the reasons why I think this, a few other people have already stated them. What I say has little influence on people anyway, because of the rank barrier that makes certain players (me) seem inferior to others (you) simply because they haven't played as long as them. Basically, we're not debating any huge matter, because the out-come of this (even if I proved my points) would have almost 0 impact on the decision. It's just how this system works: No matter how convincing one may sound, players will almost always (80% of the time?) side with the higher rank (even though the higher rank might be wrong). I'm not saying you're wrong either (after all, what IS right and wrong when debating a setting in atWar?), I'm just sharing my thoughts.
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
|
Will do, will do... But this guy was stating a whole new concept. I'm stating my opinions against a person who has played atWar for a veeeerrry long time. What's the chances they choose to support an r5's side over your's? Granted, veterans will most likely have more of the ideas that improve the atWar community, but people can't instantly dismiss an opinion just because it came from an r3-6 (the topic you linked your post to was an example, but instances like those are very rare)
---- "For out of the ground we were taken For the dust we are, And to the dust we shall return"
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
Stryko 帳戶已刪除
Bump. To all preaching about quitting, what're you hiding? 
載入中...
載入中...
|
China 帳戶已刪除 |
|
I don't know what the others are doing, but I've been busy making myself two dozen dummy email accounts at the site you linked. You know... just in case.
載入中...
載入中...
|
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
|
Stryko 帳戶已刪除 |
- 1
- 2
