Insurrection nerf

We all know its way too op....
To make it viable I suggest a range nerf of -1 and a transport price nerf of +50....
Considerations pls?

It's technically not op if both players can use it at the same time

作者： Sun Tsu, 09.05.2023 at 18:41

We all know its way too op....
To make it viable I suggest a range nerf of -1 and a transport price nerf of +50....
Considerations pls?

Ins is already nerfed beside it's enjoyable strategy for low ranks to harras premium players.

作者： Sun Tsu, 09.05.2023 at 18:41

We all know its way too op....
To make it viable I suggest a range nerf of -1 and a transport price nerf of +50....
Considerations pls?

You sir, are crazy

作者： Skittzophrenic, 10.05.2023 at 12:59

作者： Sun Tsu, 09.05.2023 at 18:41

We all know its way too op....
To make it viable I suggest a range nerf of -1 and a transport price nerf of +50....
Considerations pls?

You sir, are crazy

FEMDOM?

作者： Tokugawa, 10.05.2023 at 18:04

作者： Skittzophrenic, 10.05.2023 at 12:59

作者： Sun Tsu, 09.05.2023 at 18:41

We all know its way too op....
To make it viable I suggest a range nerf of -1 and a transport price nerf of +50....
Considerations pls?

You sir, are crazy

FEMDOM?

Yes.

I kind of agree with Lev. The range I think is suitable for the strat but the stats on the mil are way too high for their price. Personally I'd keep them as normal stat'd mil, increased range for 20 ea

INS basicly has no nerfs, and solid buffs. If we look another militia oriented strategy, GW, its hell of a nerfed in all other aspects: transports cost, infantry att, tank att. Tho it gets 70 cost marines, question is, does that equalise INS stats.

作者： Lev Davidovic, 26.06.2023 at 21:02

When will any of theese suggested changes take place? im genuinly curious, does it need a programmed update or you can change it whenever?

in general, we would have to agree on the exact changes / nerf first... as far as I know this was done by the meta team at least for the last few changes.
Then we would need Dave or maybe Sid (although I don't know if he got permissions to do those changes) to apply them.

I'm going to do a little resurrection over here.

作者： Your Laki, 23.06.2023 at 01:47

INS basicly has no nerfs, and solid buffs. [...]

After playing some games with the strat this was also my feeling. The only "nerf" that you can feel is less range for the transports, even then -1 is not that impactful.
INS feels as strong as IF, defensible like PD, cheap like GW without its downsides.
I don't think changing the transport cost will do the trick, even if we go +50 or +80. Insurrection has too much money for it too matter in the longer/larger games.

1. I would try this: reduce the transport capacity by 20%. So Naval 15 -> 12, Air 5 -> 4.
2. Alternatively It might also be worth to consider nerfing movement a bit more. Maybe -2 for Naval and -2 or -3 for Air Transports.
3. Both? If one is not enough.

INS plays to me like a zombie infestation. You snowball like crazy, when fighting neutrals, many times ending with more units after the battle than when you started. If you manage to somehow takes someone's city with 0 units you can take over like cancer spreading through their back lines.
The problem is that you are too mobile while being strong, cheap, easy to mass, hard to dislodge, with a potential to turn 3 units into 7 and then 7 into 14 and 14 into 32 if you find a weakness in someone's defenses.

All strategy games are about snowballing. A strategy focused on miltia will inherently benefit from the miltia gained on expansion and thus more snowball. Also the recruitment centier is 3/10 of the cost of a normal one which is a pretty substational change and something often overlooked about this boosted strat. its simply unfair

Nah, git gud avery!

Btw, if two opponents are in kinda equal reinf and income, ins is not that good. Imp can stonewall it.

Just remove it from the game already lol

作者： Lil Rain, 03.08.2024 at 11:09

Just remove it from the game already lol

Nah, better remove yourself from da game dude.

作者： Weisser Wolf, 03.08.2024 at 13:57

Nah, better remove yourself from da game dude.

Sure, thing!