獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 9   誰瀏覽過: 49 users
05.01.2017 - 08:40
What do you guys feel about the role that russia: volga plays in the east of europe+?
On one hand, it's extra income and production, especially if all its cities are captured.
However, on the other hand, it's far away from the main battle, so even with sm, the troops have to take 2 turns to reach.
----

載入中...
載入中...
05.01.2017 - 09:51
I usually capture it and use the remaining units to take its cities..... it is good for income and i dont use it to produce that many troops if i can produce elsewhere.
----
The enemy is in front of us, the enemy is behind us, the enemy is to the right and left of us. They cant get away this time! - General Douglas Mcarthur

載入中...
載入中...
05.01.2017 - 10:40
Don't use an AT to take it though. Take the northern Russia Central City (forget the name), and go by foot from there.
----


載入中...
載入中...
06.01.2017 - 10:23
作者: Darth., 05.01.2017 at 10:40

Don't use an AT to take it though. Take the northern Russia Central City (forget the name), and go by foot from there.

If I am going to take Volga first turn I do use an air transport but I use it also to either attack South or wall it.
----
載入中...
載入中...
06.01.2017 - 13:30
作者: LukeTan, 05.01.2017 at 08:40

What do you guys feel about the role that russia: volga plays in the east of europe+?
On one hand, it's extra income and production, especially if all its cities are captured.
However, on the other hand, it's far away from the main battle, so even with sm, the troops have to take 2 turns to reach.


if youre a quantity strat like gw pd or gc you take it asap for the unit prod. For expensive strats like sm it is not a priority. But it is worth diverting a few extra resources to gradually capture it if you have them spare especially if the game is dragging on. Also if youre getting well funded and can effectively use the extra spawn. I've seen sm players take full volga before t5 and it takes so many resources away from the main battle(as you mentioned) that it is a bad play.
----
載入中...
載入中...
06.01.2017 - 20:50
 Htin
Ukraine would have reinforcement have a edge, since it can capture more land if it sacrifice moscow
----
Hi
載入中...
載入中...
07.01.2017 - 10:42
作者: Htin, 06.01.2017 at 20:50

Ukraine would have reinforcement have a edge, since it can capture more land if it sacrifice moscow

And it's broke as shit, since all those free militia take up upkeep, RC turn 2 means economy can't kick in fast, and you're turtling with your army spread everywhere since you overexpanded and have no money. Even GW doesn't skip RC unless necessary or its 1v1 East v West without threat of Turk screwing up your shit
----


載入中...
載入中...
07.01.2017 - 10:43
 Htin
作者: Darth., 07.01.2017 at 10:42

作者: Htin, 06.01.2017 at 20:50

Ukraine would have reinforcement have a edge, since it can capture more land if it sacrifice moscow

And it's broke as shit, since all those free militia take up upkeep, RC turn 2 means economy can't kick in fast, and you're turtling with your army spread everywhere since you overexpanded and have no money. Even GW doesn't skip RC unless necessary or its 1v1 East v West without threat of Turk screwing up your shit

not in the short run
----
Hi
載入中...
載入中...
07.01.2017 - 10:45
作者: Htin, 07.01.2017 at 10:43

not in the short run

In East, long run is what matters
----


載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!