Bigger guns or more guns?

Dear friends,

In order to win a strategy and war game what would you choose more guns with a smaller caliber or less guns with bigger caliber?
For me big guns go boom but they tend to be innacurate and have a slow reload due to the bulk and weight of the ammunition. It isn't such a huge problem today but can be a problem.
However, lots of gun but small calibre is in my opinion the best.

Depends,

The scorpions in Rome2 are definitively worse than the catapults, but the catapults are better than the Huge catapults that one doesnt need...ever

I like spaghetti

I like Cuban sandwich +greek gyro

Or more beer

作者： avatar, 08.10.2014 at 13:37

Or more beer

nice clan

Hard chpice, why not a mixture though?

Quality > Quantity

Neither... nor. Better gunslingers!

作者： Columna Durruti, 11.10.2014 at 07:10

Neither... nor. Better gunslingers!

wild west gunslingers and their notoriety have been proven a fabrication and a myth (illusion )

作者： Khal.eesi, 11.10.2014 at 08:20

作者： Columna Durruti, 11.10.2014 at 07:10

Neither... nor. Better gunslingers!

wild west gunslingers and their notoriety have been proven a fabrication and a myth (illusion )

NO! Charles Bronson real.

7.62 for life

作者： Viruslegion, 10.10.2014 at 17:02

Quality > Quantity

In real life, this.

In AW though, Quantity>Quality

Hi I am Nero

作者： Nero, 15.12.2014 at 15:35

Hi I am Nero

作者： Your Monkey, 15.12.2014 at 16:28

作者： Nero, 15.12.2014 at 15:35

Hi I am Nero

In an ideal situation, a mix of the two however, if just one can be chosen i would say more smaller alober.

I say this because if you have say 10 Large guns as oppsed to 20 smaller guns, than the "enemy" would only need to take out 10 big weapons which means more resources can be diverted to one location while if they need to take out 20 they can only send half the number of resources to 20 locations. Also if one big gun for instance jams or fails, it is more catastrophic than if one small gun jams or fails as you have much more