;^) The religion of peace strikes once more [July 22]

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:23

作者： Phoenix, 23.07.2016 at 17:57

作者： Viruslegion, 23.07.2016 at 12:22

Nothing like watching some of atwars biggest rejects saying we don't know it was a muslim only to find out it was one

He wasn't inspired by Isis, he was inspired by Breivik.

That's irrelevant, the point is that yet another attack in a western country was carried out by a degenerate muslim

you people are a cancer

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:32

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:32

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

He used to read up on school shootings like Columbine.... he was more inspired by American gun laws than Islam.

Multiple news outlets are stating he had no religious affiliation, his family had lived in Germany all their lives, not religious. He was simply mental. Therefore Islam is not to blame.

The fact you keep saying it is despite the fact there is no evidence to prove any connection with him and Islam proves your own ignorance and hatred for the religion itself, pointing your finger at it without hesitation.

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2016/07/robert-farago/munich-shooter-ali-david-sonboly-simply-psycho/

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:33

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:32

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

But even if in this particular case the terrorist wasn't a Muslim, there is still plenty of instances left where the terrorist was an actual Muslim. I can't help but notice that you are conflicted by this particular issue, take a look at your actual comments made on this topic and then compare them to your other posts in general discussion, it is clear that you are being intellectually dishonest. There is nothing more irritating than when smart people pretend to be dumb.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:33

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

Not stupid at all because that would be an anomaly while another attack by a guy named Mohammad would just one of too many to keep count of, it's called a pattern.

There's no point in showing evidence that he's a Muslim anyways because you will just fall back on some retarded/contradictory tropes like "but not all Muslims" or "he's not a REAL Muslim".

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:41

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:33

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:32

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

But even if in this particular case the terrorist wasn't a Muslim, there is still plenty of instances left where the terrorist was an actual Muslim. I can't help but notice that you are conflicted by this particular issue, take a look at your actual comments made on this topic and then compare them to your other posts in general discussion, it is clear that you are being intellectually dishonest. There is nothing more irritating than when smart people pretend to be dumb.

Sorry but you're going to have to provide a source for that one... It looks like click bait to me... aanyone can write an article saying one witness heard something.

There are conflicting witness statements in every trial ever.... so this is bullshit

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:41

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:33

作者： Viruslegion, 24.07.2016 at 12:32

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:29

I havent seen a shred of evidence stating his religion.

Look at the fucking news, if you refuse to accept that he was muslim it isn't my job to provide evidence for someone as ignorant as you

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

But even if in this particular case the terrorist wasn't a Muslim, there is still plenty of instances left where the terrorist was an actual Muslim. I can't help but notice that you are conflicted by this particular issue, take a look at your actual comments made on this topic and then compare them to your other posts in general discussion, it is clear that you are being intellectually dishonest. There is nothing more irritating than when smart people pretend to be dumb.

What? I literally dont understand what you're saying. "intellectually dishonest". What the fuck are you talking about?

作者： Acquiesce, 24.07.2016 at 12:42

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:33

How stupid would you feel if he was a Christian?

Not stupid at all because that would be an anomaly while another attack by a guy named Mohammad would just one of too many to keep count of, it's called a pattern.

There's no point in showing evidence that he's a Muslim anyways because you will just fall back on some retarded/contradictory tropes like "but not all Muslims" or "he's not a REAL Muslim".

My point is that there is no evidence to back up the legitimacy of this thread, which itself does nothing to solve any issues

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:42

Sorry but you're going to have to provide a source for that one... It looks like click bait to me... aanyone can write an article saying one witness heard something.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/europe/germany-munich-shooting/

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:42

There are conflicting witness statements in every trial ever.... so this is bullshit

Due to the politics behind this type of issues, we will never know the truth.

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:48

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:42

Sorry but you're going to have to provide a source for that one... It looks like click bait to me... aanyone can write an article saying one witness heard something.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/europe/germany-munich-shooting/

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:42

There are conflicting witness statements in every trial ever.... so this is bullshit

Due to the politics behind this type of issues, we will never know the truth.

Yeah well I found another one.

"There were conflicting accounts of the gunman's background and motive in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, with some claiming Sonboly shouted "I am German" and made anti-immigrant comments and another eyewitness telling CNN she heard the shooter shout "Allahu Akbar""

http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/ali-sonboly-david-munich-gunman-identified-named-shooter-teenager-german-iranian-anders-breivik-allahu-akbar-muslim-islam-video-watch-far-right/

Paragraph 3

(i cant take SS's right now which is a pain in the anal cavity)

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:44

What? I literally dont understand what you're saying. "intellectually dishonest". What the fuck are you talking about?

That you are "debating" by using fallacies, assumptions, straw-mans, personal insults, feelings and other type of antics that only tangle the argument.

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:53

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:44

What? I literally dont understand what you're saying. "intellectually dishonest". What the fuck are you talking about?

That you are "debating" by using fallacies, assumptions, straw-mans, personal insults, feelings and other type of antics that only tangle the argument.

BRO, are you kidding me? I told you this thread is inflammatory, you started this.

The fact is "Islam" is not to blame for this event, but you're pointing the finger anyway with your piece of shit meme.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:53

Yeah well I found another one.

"There were conflicting accounts of the gunman's background and motive in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, with some claiming Sonboly shouted "I am German" and made anti-immigrant comments and another eyewitness telling CNN she heard the shooter shout "Allahu Akbar""

(i cant take SS's right now which is a pain in the anal cavity)

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:48

Due to the politics behind this type of issues, we will never know the truth.

I already wrote about such instances by saying that we will never know the truth.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:55

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:53

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:44

What? I literally dont understand what you're saying. "intellectually dishonest". What the fuck are you talking about?

That you are "debating" by using fallacies, assumptions, straw-mans, personal insults, feelings and other type of antics that only tangle the argument.

BRO, are you kidding me? I told you this thread is inflammatory, you started this.

The fact is "Islam" is not to blame for this event, but you're pointing the finger anyway with your piece of shit meme.

My topic just opened the door to a critique of Islam, cive and others posted their opinions in the matter and then you started "debating them" by using the antics that i just described. The fact that you are sorely focusing in my meme while knowing fully well this topic is no longer about the meme, makes you look more dishonest.

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 13:01

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:55

作者： Tundy, 24.07.2016 at 12:53

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 12:44

What? I literally dont understand what you're saying. "intellectually dishonest". What the fuck are you talking about?

That you are "debating" by using fallacies, assumptions, straw-mans, personal insults, feelings and other type of antics that only tangle the argument.

BRO, are you kidding me? I told you this thread is inflammatory, you started this.

The fact is "Islam" is not to blame for this event, but you're pointing the finger anyway with your piece of shit meme.

My topic just opened the door to a critique of Islam, cive and others posted their opinions in the matter and then you started "debating them" by using the antics that i just described. The fact that you are sorely focusing in my meme while knowing fully well this topic is no longer about the meme, makes you look more dishonest.

You can't be real.

You posted this thread to take a stab at Islam

The very title is "The religion of peace strikes once more". This is not an unbiased thread intended for people to "share their opinions". You're leading people on, the probleem is you.

You're fucking deluded.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 13:24

You can't be real.

You posted this thread to take a stab at Islam

I am being generous by only taking into consideration recent events 2015-2016, if i really wanted to take a stab at Islam i could go back to 800 A.D and start discussing Muslim expansion, then proceed to talk about human rights violations in middle eastern countries.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 13:24

The very title is "The religion of peace strikes once more". This is not an unbiased thread intended for people to "share their opinions".

All Opinions are biased, welcome to politics.

作者： Phoenix, 24.07.2016 at 13:24

You're leading people on, the probleem is you.
You're fucking deluded.

I am not the one killing people everyday in the name of my religion, i am sorry my topic triggered you.

Time to reset the counter ...

Since this topic was posted there have been an additional 2 attacks in Germany
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07/24/explosion-germany-kills-least-one-authorities-blame-device/
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07/24/syrian-refugee-machetes-woman-to-death-injures-two-more-in-germany/