獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 7   誰瀏覽過: 65 users
31.01.2011 - 04:19
Hello!

i've noticed something funny in this game,there is bombers but no jet fighter!! ive seen before than ,for the dev, to make a new units, it must be "unique" . so i propose a jet fighter unit who gonna be the nightmare of the bombers (btw ive noticed than bombers can fight each other...o_o).

this unit will be vunerable against anti-aircraft and will be efficient against infantry units
hey will not be able to take a city (like bombers).


hope than ill help.
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 04:47
 Ivan (管理員)
'Bombers' are called like this because we didn't want to name them 'Planes' or 'Air Unit' In reality, 1 'Bomber' is a whole squadron/escadrille of planes, which would include both bombers and fighters. A bit misleading, perhaps, but if you can come up with a better name, we will consider changing it.
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 05:25
You know, if each individual unit is suppose to represent an army, why not name them as such?

Tank - Armored Battalion
Infantry - actually this ones pretty vague, but to go with the flow could be like Infantry Division?
Marines - I don't know much about the marines, so eh
Bomber - Air Wing
Battleship - Carrier Battlegroup
Submarine - These typically go solo, so maybe just leaving it as is?

Anyways you get the point, since they're not actually individual tanks or infantry, why not have their names represent this fact?
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 05:46
 Ivan (管理員)
The answer is 'Tanks' sounds simpler and less confusing than 'Armored Battalion'. Same for Battleship/Carrier Battlegroup and others.
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 05:50
Yeah well, those could very well be unofficial names. I mean if you see a unit named 'Armored Battalion' and it has a picture of a tank, and it's stack icon is a tank, you'd likely call it a tank. No reason why official stuff can't be slightly more complicated, I mean that's why slangs exist after all. And it would solve a few issues since this isn't the first time I've seen you post that one unit = a small army.
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 15:01
Well AW is young and on the way of perfection. im sure you will be forced to change name because plenty of player will soon want a "diversification" of the actual units
載入中...
載入中...
31.01.2011 - 22:33
作者: Ivan, 31.01.2011 at 04:47

'Bombers' are called like this because we didn't want to name them 'Planes' or 'Air Unit' In reality, 1 'Bomber' is a whole squadron/escadrille of planes, which would include both bombers and fighters. A bit misleading, perhaps, but if you can come up with a better name, we will consider changing it.


I'm partial to "Jets"
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!