獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 24   誰瀏覽過: 39 users
21.11.2011 - 21:01
I get that they can fly far and attack without warning, but they're about as useful as bombers. I spent 18k SP on the upgrade and they seem to be pointless. Maybe its just me, but I think that a boost to their effectiveness or a reduction in their price would be worthwhile.
載入中...
載入中...
21.11.2011 - 21:53
Stealths are only good in MoS cause they are 200 bucks. They don't need any changes.
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 19:06
Stealth units are not intended for battle-to-battle, they're intended for stealth purposes.

The disadvantage you get from doing otherwise comes with the unit
----
~goodnamesalltaken~
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 19:56
作者: goodnames679, 22.11.2011 at 19:06

Stealth units are not intended for battle-to-battle, they're intended for stealth purposes.

The disadvantage you get from doing otherwise comes with the unit

Even not battle-to-battle (if you mean fighting multiple battles is what you mean), my stealths are as effective as bombers. It sucks. Why cant we just have a powerful unit? When I fly stealths at a city, I lose the same amount of people that were in the city, just like a bomber.
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 20:31
Stealth's are better than bombers, except in defense.
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 20:33
作者: the99percent, 22.11.2011 at 20:31

Stealth's are better than bombers, except in defense.

Not in my experience
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 20:43
Here is an example, 4 stealth and 1 inf can kill 8 militia, pretty much every time, it takes 6 bombers to do the same, maybe 5, but most peopel use 6. Here is a example when you have fewer rein when bombers would not be better, also Stealth's have longer range, Longer range = one of the most important things in the game.

I can only speak for MoS not SM.
載入中...
載入中...
22.11.2011 - 21:40
作者: Runway1R, 22.11.2011 at 19:56

作者: goodnames679, 22.11.2011 at 19:06

Stealth units are not intended for battle-to-battle, they're intended for stealth purposes.

The disadvantage you get from doing otherwise comes with the unit

Even not battle-to-battle (if you mean fighting multiple battles is what you mean), my stealths are as effective as bombers. It sucks. Why cant we just have a powerful unit? When I fly stealths at a city, I lose the same amount of people that were in the city, just like a bomber.


If they're "as effective", AND they have the stealth bonus, and they're not that much more expensive, then I don't see how you have any room to complain at all.
----
~goodnamesalltaken~
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 07:37
作者: goodnames679, 22.11.2011 at 21:40

作者: Runway1R, 22.11.2011 at 19:56

作者: goodnames679, 22.11.2011 at 19:06

Stealth units are not intended for battle-to-battle, they're intended for stealth purposes.

The disadvantage you get from doing otherwise comes with the unit

Even not battle-to-battle (if you mean fighting multiple battles is what you mean), my stealths are as effective as bombers. It sucks. Why cant we just have a powerful unit? When I fly stealths at a city, I lose the same amount of people that were in the city, just like a bomber.


If they're "as effective", AND they have the stealth bonus, and they're not that much more expensive, then I don't see how you have any room to complain at all.

作者: goodnames679, 22.11.2011 at 21:40

they're not that much more expensive

Stealths cost almost twice as much as a bomber, but are only as effective. The stealth bonus isnt that great, and the range bonus does not make up for it.
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 08:36
Surprise you bought a useless upgrade. Only use for turnblocking and when extremely rich (very rare occasions).
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 08:42
Stealths are great. They are STEALTH. With Mos or SM, I use them with small marine groups to hit the enemies rear. The single Marine deals less damage than the stealths and therefore hit last in the turns. So a large group of stealths and a few marines act like Bombers and infantry.

We're talking large distances here though. Pretty useless in Europe.
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 08:50
zizou strong
帳戶已刪除
Stealths should be less expensive with MoS.
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 09:13
They already are less expensive if you are playing MoS, while they can also be used as a combo with marines while playing with MoS and SM.

Stealths don't need any buff.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 10:07
作者: Pinheiro, 23.11.2011 at 09:13

They already are less expensive if you are playing MoS, while they can also be used as a combo with marines while playing with MoS and SM.

Stealths don't need any buff.

This
----
Exceptional claims demand exceptional evidence.
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 10:38
 AR11
Its only useful with SM and MOS , there for I think no body should buy this uppgrade, cuz u getting it free when u using SM or MOS,with any other strategy its just not good....maybe just for bloking or somthing
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 10:52
Yes. In other strategies it can still be useful for blocking stacks and to assist in late game offensives.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 12:33
You don't buy the stealth upgrade, cause you get them free with MoS, the only strat that should bother using them, cause they cost 200 in MoS - 40 bucks more than bombers in MoS. Stealths need no buff.
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 19:18
Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx
載入中...
載入中...
23.11.2011 - 20:45
 YOBA
作者: Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:18

Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx

No, that would be so douchey. Can they carry marines? Maybe that could be done, this could simulate the landing of paratroopers. Members of the special forces that is.
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
載入中...
載入中...
24.11.2011 - 07:34
 AR11
作者: YOBA, 23.11.2011 at 20:45

作者: Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:18

Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx

No, that would be so douchey. Can they carry marines? Maybe that could be done, this could simulate the landing of paratroopers. Members of the special forces that is.

damnnnn thats great idea!
載入中...
載入中...
24.11.2011 - 12:33
作者: YOBA, 23.11.2011 at 20:45

作者: Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:18

Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx

No, that would be so douchey. Can they carry marines? Maybe that could be done, this could simulate the landing of paratroopers. Members of the special forces that is.


...he's trolling dude...
載入中...
載入中...
24.11.2011 - 13:01
 YOBA
作者: Garde, 24.11.2011 at 12:33

作者: YOBA, 23.11.2011 at 20:45

作者: Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:18

Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx

No, that would be so douchey. Can they carry marines? Maybe that could be done, this could simulate the landing of paratroopers. Members of the special forces that is.

...he's trolling dude...

>mods
>trolling
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
載入中...
載入中...
24.11.2011 - 13:03
作者: YOBA, 24.11.2011 at 13:01

作者: Garde, 24.11.2011 at 12:33

作者: YOBA, 23.11.2011 at 20:45

作者: Guest14502, 23.11.2011 at 19:18

Can you make stealths able to capture cities? thx

No, that would be so douchey. Can they carry marines? Maybe that could be done, this could simulate the landing of paratroopers. Members of the special forces that is.

...he's trolling dude...

>mods
>trolling


Paradox.
載入中...
載入中...
25.11.2011 - 12:00
作者: YOBA, 24.11.2011 at 13:01

>mods
>trolling

>people
>misunderstanding trolling
>"ncm is mod" love you guest, 5/5 after that
----
Dinner. The imprisonment of arachnids.
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!