獲得高級隱藏所有廣告
發表: 7   誰瀏覽過: 64 users
13.03.2012 - 03:23
Since this unit is totally ignored it could use a bit of a change.

I'm thinking it acts like a general in that it gives +1 defence against bombers and stealths (and helis I guess) to all units in the stack. Multiple anti-aircraft do not stack this effect, it is capped at +1 per unit. It also has 0 movement so it represents a physical structure within a city rather than a unit (Pretty much to stop the AA being moved around as part of a megastack of units).

I'm wondering whether units can be created that represent fixed physical objects (like buildings etc.) that cannot be moved via. any transport and simply act as buffs for that city (like Officers and Admirals, but for Cities). It would open up a whole new world of strategy if you had to plan and invest in your empires infrastructure as well.

Anyway, discuss.
----
作者: Amok, 29.04.2012 at 08:36

Gardevoir, your obnoxiousness really baffles me sometimes...just leave for good already or stop whining.
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 15:10
Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them.
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 15:35
作者: Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10

Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them.


They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there.
----
I like stuff.... Yay?
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 21:03
作者: Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35

作者: Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10

Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them.


They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there.

not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 21:09
作者: nonames, 13.03.2012 at 21:03

作者: Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35

作者: Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10

Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them.


They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there.

not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry

yeah 3 infantry or 1 AA?
----
作者: NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04

I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me?
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 21:09
作者: nonames, 13.03.2012 at 21:03

作者: Deray YG, 13.03.2012 at 15:35

作者: Aristosseur, 13.03.2012 at 15:10

Taking in mind that they are extremely underused I'd like to see a rework on them.


They're only really used against SM players so yeah I agree with you there.

not even against them, it is cheaper to use infantry

yeah 3 infantry or 1 AA?
----
作者: NateBaller, 30.08.2012 at 20:04

I make Americans look bad? Are you kidding me?
載入中...
載入中...
13.03.2012 - 23:39
Thats why players use them in small numbers like 6-10 then just spam infantry.
----
I like stuff.... Yay?
載入中...
載入中...
atWar

About Us
Contact

隱私條例 | 服務條例 | 橫額 | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

加入我們在

將遊戲傳播出去!