我被引用的發表

作者： NoOne, 20.01.2015 at 14:12

Personally I don't usually join 3vs3. I like them in theory, and on occasion when I play with members from my cln I have fun, but I never play them in the lobby with the general public. These are the reasons why I don't play 3vs3 keep in mind I'm a rank 9, and know how the game woks in general so imagine how a new player might feel.
1. I usually play scenarios, and I'm not used to the default units anymore.
2. Since I play scenarios, the countries are already pre-made so I never practice expansion.
3. Even in the days of Afterwind when the lobby was full of world maps I always picked in the Americas or Asia, while 3vs3 are almost always in Europe.
4. Due to "reason 3" I was never as good expanding in Europe as in the Americas.
5. In general players in AtWar take losing and winning way too seriously. If I win a game it's because of "lag" or because I got lucky. If I lose it's because I'm a noob.
6. If I mess up an expansion in a 3vs3 my teammates will rage, insult me, and possibly leave. The other team will also insult me.
7. If I say I'm going to leave after a teammate leaves first turn, then someone from the other team will insult me.
8. If I don't mess up the expansion too bad, but still lose then my team mates will still probably insult me, and the opposing team will still probably insult me.
9. If I have very good team mates and end up winning, then I still get insulted by the other team for only winning because of my team mates.
10. Ultimately I'm playing the game for fun, and if I'm not having fun in 3vs3 then why should I be forced to play it until I get good at it?

omg, is true, every single point,specially point 5,i know rp players that are as good (only a few really ) as any 3 vs 3 players, and when they win 3 vs 3 the 'competitive' players start claiming stupid reasons about why they lost, just because the other player plays rp, also the competitive players say every single little mistake commited by the rp player, even if they are commited worse fails, the other points aplies to people that is learning the 3 vs 3 scenario, they want to get fun, but they only encounter an hostile response from the more experienced players,calling noobs to rank 7 players that has never played 3 vs 3 because they didn't do the 'correct' expansion even if this is fault of the own community, how do you expect players to play 3 vs 3 if they can't enter until rank 7?, 3 vs 3 is like a job to some people, i ve also seen host kicking 'troll' players ( i was kicked for picking bulgaria in a 3v3) for picking a 'bad country',what is the point of the picks if you, as low rank are forced to pick one of the normal picks? i can't experiment, ive been starting to think that 3 vs 3 is like a mechanical scenario ( fun, but still mechanical) in wich you have to do the same thing every game.

I would like to be able to change the colour of my shield in the lobby, is always orange and i don't like that colour

作者： Guest, 15.01.2015 at 02:48

I wanted to know if its possible to pass through the suez canal and panama canal and i read on another topic that its possible i could pass through suez canal but i cant find panama canal???

panama canal is in panama right!

i know where panama is but i dont see panama canal does it exist on the map? and if it does can any one show me screen shot of its place please?

The canal is not horizontal XD , try to aim the boat in 80 degree up more or less

作者： Columna Durruti, 14.01.2015 at 20:51

作者： IHavok, 14.01.2015 at 20:08

Only the decent and lucky scenarios survive. is there any wrong with it?

Assuming decency is the driving force of hosted games.

:O if there is a map maker able to host his game more than 500 times, ill rep him XD

Only the decent and lucky scenarios survive. is there any wrong with it?

It depends in how much pressure turkey puts in germany, imp turkey with enough funding can easily destroy everything in its path

Zizou for the win

作者： O T, 29.12.2014 at 08:53

IVE BEEN TO 142 COUNTRY'S NO ONE IS FREE

142??????' wow, are you a bird or something?

作者： RaulPB, 13.11.2014 at 08:26

作者： Skanderbeg, 13.11.2014 at 06:29

There would be more 3v3 players if there are training clans, but they fail for some reason. Band of Brothers, Dalmati Pups, Illirifaction, Victorious Scholars.
Its not that hard for premium 3v3 players to open atleast once a day low rank 3v3, teach them how to play eu+, they doesnt have to be in your clan.
But their ego wont let them, they hang out with their buddies rank 10 and 13 in 5 members-clan, waiting 2am to play cw and argue if there was wallglitch or not.

They fail for the lack of patience and dedication to newby players i guess. Not all newby will get to the level of a pro, not everyone has the same ease to learn or to improvise, not everyone will have pro skills, not cause they don't want to, just cause they don't have that quality or it's really hard for them. It's undestandable. But it seems like they all seem to discover some pretty much op player which is new and only needs a few indications and a little effort to make him the perfect eu player hehe there might be this super noob player which doesnt even wall but once he's been taught he becomes the most pro of all. It's all about giving the chance to a person and be patient cause you might not find the right person after 100 different tries. I'm trying to teach some people, help, assist, make games for them, etc. and it's not easy to see and be patient with some certain circunstances but I try my best obviously these people will need to fail 10k times before they get to our skill level but will eventually happen. Patience is the mother of all science!

Shadow shadows was a good clan, is a graveyard right now, sun tsu put a lot of effor in us , if you see the former members you will see the amount of fails, but the former core group of ss are now really good players , ranks 6 who play 3 vs 3 and are in decent clans, the training clans fails because the leader has to be some kind of maniac that is teaching 30 guys, from wich most of them fails learning, to try to teach 30 more guys again, to fail again, eventually you find good players, but it needs a lot of time and a good leader, otherwise the clan dies, shadow shadows died when sun tsu left, and that probably happened to the rest of the training clans.

Free global?
LMAO just to imagine the spam makes me laught

Hello, i have this idea, give a small bonus to surviving units, like +1 atk or +1 def, if a unit has survived more than 5 battles, the unit should be better than a regular one, it would not be too much since the units die pretty quick, but when rushing, or in closed battles those units could make the difference. what do you think?

He attacked the wall with all his tanks, but somehow he did not turnblocked it, really bad luck, then the tanks followed them to kiev.

作者： Waffel, 05.12.2014 at 02:23

作者： IHavok, 04.12.2014 at 16:21

What about troop experience, i mean , a unit that have survived 5 battles could have a little bonus, +1 df or +1 atk it would not be that much since the units die pretty quick , but in closed battles those experienced units could make the difference

Hmm it sounds like a nice bonus though, but in worldgames that mostly last longer than 20+ turns won't it be TO op? Since at turn 10, for example its possible to get America full. with or without enemies. then America will be TO op compared to most of the other continent/players that hast conquor all. I think a upgrade like that would make this game bit more unbalanced . But thats my opinion, you can make a thread about it and maybe some people will actually like it ?

Gl anyways.

i did not considered neutrals :D, but in a nomal battle, few units remain alive, unless you send a huge stack against a small one, though i don't think this would be possible since all of the unist will need a counter of battles, and in world map it would be 1 battle counter for each units

What about troop experience, i mean , a unit that have survived 5 battles could have a little bonus, +1 df or +1 atk it would not be that much since the units die pretty quick , but in closed battles those experienced units could make the difference

Well, i ve played rp and cw, and in rp you have 30-40 turn games with 6 min turns, 3-4 hours more or less and the most sp player had 1500 sp , then i played a 15 turn cw normal settings and i won 1k sp. rp isn't a farm, you will not see a rp player playing 3 vs 3 or cwingand when the 3 vs 3 players offer 1 vs 1 to beat an rp player easily , they don't play in the rp scenario, they play in europe, is like a player that only play ancient world calls noob to a europe player because he lost in ancient , i truly don't understand all the hate some guys have for rp and how many post have you done against rp , an rp player plays rp, not europe or wwii, etc, and in this very moment cw is a bigger farm than rp

The chip man, it changed everything,communication, systems , our way of life , even the war, we passed from a huge computer that only made basic maths to all our tecnology, in only 50 years, though i can't know about the futute

Ok, thanks for the answer

So, i heard this a while ago, i been thinking how is this possible, but i can't find a way, i ve just played if once and the range really suck, so, is really possible to reach paris using iron fist?

Support